Lancet Retracts Fatigue Syndrome Paper

Our deep  impulse to seek closure, certainty, and finality — especially in the realm of health and science – is extremely powerful.

To live for an extended period without these things means inhabiting that insecure mental terrain where questions remain unanswered, where solutions are partial, where  causation is rarely proven with complete certainty, and where one day’s “truth” can quickly disappear with the emergence of  some new revelation.

Truth, in short, is a process, not a sacrament.

And so it is  that today  we learn about a development in scientific research that requires us, yet again,  to confront the fluid and constantly evolving nature of scientific truth.

What was “true” may no longer be “true.”

Wouldn’t this  be as good a time as any to finally accept the transitory nature of  scientific inquiry and recognize that real scientific literacy requires a tolerance and acceptance of this uncertainty?

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s